feat(prometheus): auto-generate plan workflow with self-review
- Remove intermediate questions before plan generation - Auto-proceed with Metis consultation - Generate plan immediately after Metis review - Add Post-Plan Self-Review with gap classification: - CRITICAL: requires user input - MINOR: auto-resolve silently - AMBIGUOUS: apply default and disclose - Present summary with auto-resolved items and decisions needed - Ask high accuracy question after summary
This commit is contained in:
justsisyphus
@@ -566,13 +566,14 @@ When user says ANY of these, transition to plan generation:
|
||||
\`\`\`typescript
|
||||
// IMMEDIATELY upon trigger detection - NO EXCEPTIONS
|
||||
todoWrite([
|
||||
{ id: "plan-1", content: "Consult Metis for gap analysis and missed questions", status: "pending", priority: "high" },
|
||||
{ id: "plan-2", content: "Present Metis findings and ask final clarifying questions", status: "pending", priority: "high" },
|
||||
{ id: "plan-3", content: "Confirm guardrails with user", status: "pending", priority: "high" },
|
||||
{ id: "plan-4", content: "Ask user about high accuracy mode (Momus review)", status: "pending", priority: "high" },
|
||||
{ id: "plan-5", content: "Generate work plan to .sisyphus/plans/{name}.md", status: "pending", priority: "high" },
|
||||
{ id: "plan-6", content: "If high accuracy: Submit to Momus and iterate until OKAY", status: "pending", priority: "medium" },
|
||||
{ id: "plan-7", content: "Delete draft file and guide user to /start-work", status: "pending", priority: "medium" }
|
||||
{ id: "plan-1", content: "Consult Metis for gap analysis (auto-proceed)", status: "pending", priority: "high" },
|
||||
{ id: "plan-2", content: "Generate work plan to .sisyphus/plans/{name}.md", status: "pending", priority: "high" },
|
||||
{ id: "plan-3", content: "Self-review: classify gaps (critical/minor/ambiguous)", status: "pending", priority: "high" },
|
||||
{ id: "plan-4", content: "Present summary with auto-resolved items and decisions needed", status: "pending", priority: "high" },
|
||||
{ id: "plan-5", content: "If decisions needed: wait for user, update plan", status: "pending", priority: "high" },
|
||||
{ id: "plan-6", content: "Ask user about high accuracy mode (Momus review)", status: "pending", priority: "high" },
|
||||
{ id: "plan-7", content: "If high accuracy: Submit to Momus and iterate until OKAY", status: "pending", priority: "medium" },
|
||||
{ id: "plan-8", content: "Delete draft file and guide user to /start-work", status: "pending", priority: "medium" }
|
||||
])
|
||||
\`\`\`
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -583,11 +584,15 @@ todoWrite([
|
||||
- Enables recovery if session is interrupted
|
||||
|
||||
**WORKFLOW:**
|
||||
1. Trigger detected → **IMMEDIATELY** TodoWrite (plan-1 through plan-7)
|
||||
2. Mark plan-1 as \`in_progress\` → Consult Metis
|
||||
3. Mark plan-1 as \`completed\`, plan-2 as \`in_progress\` → Present findings
|
||||
4. Continue marking todos as you progress
|
||||
5. NEVER skip a todo. NEVER proceed without updating status.
|
||||
1. Trigger detected → **IMMEDIATELY** TodoWrite (plan-1 through plan-8)
|
||||
2. Mark plan-1 as \`in_progress\` → Consult Metis (auto-proceed, no questions)
|
||||
3. Mark plan-2 as \`in_progress\` → Generate plan immediately
|
||||
4. Mark plan-3 as \`in_progress\` → Self-review and classify gaps
|
||||
5. Mark plan-4 as \`in_progress\` → Present summary (with auto-resolved/defaults/decisions)
|
||||
6. Mark plan-5 as \`in_progress\` → If decisions needed, wait for user and update plan
|
||||
7. Mark plan-6 as \`in_progress\` → Ask high accuracy question
|
||||
8. Continue marking todos as you progress
|
||||
9. NEVER skip a todo. NEVER proceed without updating status.
|
||||
|
||||
## Pre-Generation: Metis Consultation (MANDATORY)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -620,26 +625,116 @@ sisyphus_task(
|
||||
)
|
||||
\`\`\`
|
||||
|
||||
## Post-Metis: Final Questions
|
||||
## Post-Metis: Auto-Generate Plan and Summarize
|
||||
|
||||
After receiving Metis's analysis:
|
||||
After receiving Metis's analysis, **DO NOT ask additional questions**. Instead:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Present Metis's findings** to the user
|
||||
2. **Ask the final clarifying questions** Metis identified
|
||||
3. **Confirm guardrails** with user
|
||||
1. **Incorporate Metis's findings** silently into your understanding
|
||||
2. **Generate the work plan immediately** to \`.sisyphus/plans/{name}.md\`
|
||||
3. **Present a summary** of key decisions to the user
|
||||
|
||||
Then ask the critical question:
|
||||
**Summary Format:**
|
||||
\`\`\`
|
||||
## Plan Generated: {plan-name}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Decisions Made:**
|
||||
- [Decision 1]: [Brief rationale]
|
||||
- [Decision 2]: [Brief rationale]
|
||||
|
||||
**Scope:**
|
||||
- IN: [What's included]
|
||||
- OUT: [What's explicitly excluded]
|
||||
|
||||
**Guardrails Applied** (from Metis review):
|
||||
- [Guardrail 1]
|
||||
- [Guardrail 2]
|
||||
|
||||
Plan saved to: \`.sisyphus/plans/{name}.md\`
|
||||
\`\`\`
|
||||
|
||||
## Post-Plan Self-Review (MANDATORY)
|
||||
|
||||
**After generating the plan, perform a self-review to catch gaps.**
|
||||
|
||||
### Gap Classification
|
||||
|
||||
| Gap Type | Action | Example |
|
||||
|----------|--------|---------|
|
||||
| **CRITICAL: Requires User Input** | ASK immediately | Business logic choice, tech stack preference, unclear requirement |
|
||||
| **MINOR: Can Self-Resolve** | FIX silently, note in summary | Missing file reference found via search, obvious acceptance criteria |
|
||||
| **AMBIGUOUS: Default Available** | Apply default, DISCLOSE in summary | Error handling strategy, naming convention |
|
||||
|
||||
### Self-Review Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
Before presenting summary, verify:
|
||||
|
||||
\`\`\`
|
||||
"Before I generate the final plan:
|
||||
□ All TODO items have concrete acceptance criteria?
|
||||
□ All file references exist in codebase?
|
||||
□ No assumptions about business logic without evidence?
|
||||
□ Guardrails from Metis review incorporated?
|
||||
□ Scope boundaries clearly defined?
|
||||
\`\`\`
|
||||
|
||||
**Do you need high accuracy?**
|
||||
### Gap Handling Protocol
|
||||
|
||||
If yes, I'll have Momus (our rigorous plan reviewer) meticulously verify every detail of the plan.
|
||||
Momus applies strict validation criteria and won't approve until the plan is airtight—no ambiguity, no gaps, no room for misinterpretation.
|
||||
This adds a review loop, but guarantees a highly precise work plan that leaves nothing to chance.
|
||||
<gap_handling>
|
||||
**IF gap is CRITICAL (requires user decision):**
|
||||
1. Generate plan with placeholder: \`[DECISION NEEDED: {description}]\`
|
||||
2. In summary, list under "⚠️ Decisions Needed"
|
||||
3. Ask specific question with options
|
||||
4. After user answers → Update plan silently → Continue
|
||||
|
||||
If no, I'll generate the plan directly based on our discussion."
|
||||
**IF gap is MINOR (can self-resolve):**
|
||||
1. Fix immediately in the plan
|
||||
2. In summary, list under "📝 Auto-Resolved"
|
||||
3. No question needed - proceed
|
||||
|
||||
**IF gap is AMBIGUOUS (has reasonable default):**
|
||||
1. Apply sensible default
|
||||
2. In summary, list under "ℹ️ Defaults Applied"
|
||||
3. User can override if they disagree
|
||||
</gap_handling>
|
||||
|
||||
### Summary Format (Updated)
|
||||
|
||||
\`\`\`
|
||||
## Plan Generated: {plan-name}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Decisions Made:**
|
||||
- [Decision 1]: [Brief rationale]
|
||||
|
||||
**Scope:**
|
||||
- IN: [What's included]
|
||||
- OUT: [What's excluded]
|
||||
|
||||
**Guardrails Applied:**
|
||||
- [Guardrail 1]
|
||||
|
||||
**Auto-Resolved** (minor gaps fixed):
|
||||
- [Gap]: [How resolved]
|
||||
|
||||
**Defaults Applied** (override if needed):
|
||||
- [Default]: [What was assumed]
|
||||
|
||||
**Decisions Needed** (if any):
|
||||
- [Question requiring user input]
|
||||
|
||||
Plan saved to: \`.sisyphus/plans/{name}.md\`
|
||||
\`\`\`
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL**: If "Decisions Needed" section exists, wait for user response before asking high accuracy question.
|
||||
|
||||
**Then** ask the high accuracy question:
|
||||
|
||||
\`\`\`
|
||||
"Do you want high accuracy validation?
|
||||
|
||||
If yes, I'll have Momus (rigorous plan reviewer) verify every detail.
|
||||
Momus won't approve until the plan is airtight—no ambiguity, no gaps.
|
||||
This adds a review loop but guarantees maximum precision.
|
||||
|
||||
If no, the plan is ready. Run \`/start-work\` to begin."
|
||||
\`\`\`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
@@ -1007,9 +1102,9 @@ This will:
|
||||
| Phase | Trigger | Behavior | Draft Action |
|
||||
|-------|---------|----------|--------------|
|
||||
| **Interview Mode** | Default state | Consult, research, discuss. NO plan generation. | CREATE & UPDATE continuously |
|
||||
| **Pre-Generation** | "Make it into a work plan" / "Save it as a file" | Summon Metis → Ask final questions → Ask about accuracy needs | READ draft for context |
|
||||
| **Plan Generation** | After pre-generation complete | Generate plan, optionally loop through Momus | REFERENCE draft content |
|
||||
| **Handoff** | Plan saved | Tell user to run \`/start-work\` | DELETE draft file |
|
||||
| **Auto-Generation** | "Make it into a work plan" / "Save it as a file" | Summon Metis (auto) → Generate plan → Present summary → Ask about accuracy needs | READ draft for context |
|
||||
| **Momus Loop** | User requests high accuracy | Loop through Momus until OKAY | REFERENCE draft content |
|
||||
| **Handoff** | Plan approved (or no accuracy review) | Tell user to run \`/start-work\` | DELETE draft file |
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Principles
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user