Files
oh-my-openagent/docs/guide/agent-model-matching.md
YeonGyu-Kim a081ddcefb docs: update documentation for v3.13.1 feature changes
- Document object-style fallback_models with per-model settings
- Add model-settings compatibility normalization docs
- Document file:// URI support for prompt and prompt_append
- Add deterministic core-agent order (Tab cycling) docs
- Update rename compatibility notes (legacy plugin warning)
- Document doctor legacy package name detection
- Add models.dev-backed capability cache documentation
- Update Hephaestus default to gpt-5.4 (medium)
- Correct MiniMax M2.7/M2.5 usage across all docs
- Update all agent/category provider chain tables
- Fix stale CLI install/doctor options to match source
- Add refresh-model-capabilities command to CLI reference

Co-authored-by: Sisyphus <sisyphus@oh-my-opencode>
2026-03-27 12:59:50 +09:00

19 KiB

Agent-Model Matching Guide

For agents and users: Why each agent needs a specific model — and how to customize without breaking things.

The Core Insight: Models Are Developers

Think of AI models as developers on a team. Each has a different brain, different personality, different strengths. A model isn't just "smarter" or "dumber." It thinks differently. Give the same instruction to Claude and GPT, and they'll interpret it in fundamentally different ways.

This isn't a bug. It's the foundation of the entire system.

Oh My OpenAgent assigns each agent a model that matches its working style — like building a team where each person is in the role that fits their personality.

Sisyphus: The Sociable Lead

Sisyphus is the developer who knows everyone, goes everywhere, and gets things done through communication and coordination. Talks to other agents, understands context across the whole codebase, delegates work intelligently, and codes well too. But deep, purely technical problems? He'll struggle a bit.

This is why Sisyphus uses Claude / Kimi / GLM. These models excel at:

  • Following complex, multi-step instructions (Sisyphus's prompt is ~1,100 lines)
  • Maintaining conversation flow across many tool calls
  • Understanding nuanced delegation and orchestration patterns
  • Producing well-structured, communicative output

Using Sisyphus with older GPT models would be like taking your best project manager — the one who coordinates everyone, runs standups, and keeps the whole team aligned — and sticking them in a room alone to debug a race condition. Wrong fit. GPT-5.4 now has a dedicated Sisyphus prompt path, but GPT is still not the default recommendation for the orchestrator.

Hephaestus: The Deep Specialist

Hephaestus is the developer who stays in their room coding all day. Doesn't talk much. Might seem socially awkward. But give them a hard technical problem and they'll emerge three hours later with a solution nobody else could have found.

This is why Hephaestus uses GPT-5.4. GPT-5.4 is built for exactly this:

  • Deep, autonomous exploration without hand-holding
  • Multi-file reasoning across complex codebases
  • Principle-driven execution (give a goal, not a recipe)
  • Working independently for extended periods

Using Hephaestus with GLM or Kimi would be like assigning your most communicative, sociable developer to sit alone and do nothing but deep technical work. They'd get it done eventually, but they wouldn't shine — you'd be wasting exactly the skills that make them valuable.

The Takeaway

Every agent's prompt is tuned to match its model's personality. When you change the model, you change the brain — and the same instructions get understood completely differently. Model matching isn't about "better" or "worse." It's about fit.


How Claude and GPT Think Differently

This matters for understanding why some agents support both model families while others don't.

Claude responds to mechanics-driven prompts — detailed checklists, templates, step-by-step procedures. More rules = more compliance. You can write a 1,100-line prompt with nested workflows and Claude will follow every step.

GPT (especially 5.2+) responds to principle-driven prompts — concise principles, XML structure, explicit decision criteria. More rules = more contradiction surface = more drift. GPT works best when you state the goal and let it figure out the mechanics.

Real example: Prometheus's Claude prompt is ~1,100 lines across 7 files. The GPT prompt achieves the same behavior with 3 principles in ~121 lines. Same outcome, completely different approach.

Agents that support both families (Prometheus, Atlas) auto-detect your model at runtime and switch prompts via isGptModel(). You don't have to think about it.


Agent Profiles

Communicators → Claude / Kimi / GLM

These agents have Claude-optimized prompts — long, detailed, mechanics-driven. They need models that reliably follow complex, multi-layered instructions.

Agent Role Fallback Chain Notes
Sisyphus Main orchestrator Claude Opus → opencode-go/kimi-k2.5 → K2P5 → Kimi K2.5 → GPT-5.4 → GLM-5 → Big Pickle Claude-family first. GPT-5.4 has dedicated prompt support. Kimi available through multiple providers.
Metis Plan gap analyzer Claude Opus → GPT-5.4 → opencode-go/glm-5 → K2P5 Claude preferred. GPT-5.4 as secondary before GLM-5 fallback.

Dual-Prompt Agents → Claude preferred, GPT supported

These agents ship separate prompts for Claude and GPT families. They auto-detect your model and switch at runtime.

Agent Role Fallback Chain Notes
Prometheus Strategic planner Claude Opus → GPT-5.4 → opencode-go/glm-5 → Gemini 3.1 Pro Interview-mode planning. GPT prompt is compact and principle-driven.
Atlas Todo orchestrator Claude Sonnet → opencode-go/kimi-k2.5 → GPT-5.4 Claude first, opencode-go as intermediate, GPT-5.4 as last resort.

Deep Specialists → GPT

These agents are built for GPT's principle-driven style. Their prompts assume autonomous, goal-oriented execution. Don't override to Claude.

Agent Role Fallback Chain Notes
Hephaestus Autonomous deep worker GPT-5.4 (medium) Requires GPT access. The craftsman.
Oracle Architecture consultant GPT-5.4 → Gemini 3.1 Pro → Claude Opus → opencode-go/glm-5 Read-only high-IQ consultation.
Momus Ruthless reviewer GPT-5.4 → Claude Opus → Gemini 3.1 Pro → opencode-go/glm-5 Verification and plan review. GPT-5.4 uses xhigh variant.

Utility Runners → Speed over Intelligence

These agents do grep, search, and retrieval. They intentionally use the fastest, cheapest models available. Don't "upgrade" them to Opus — that's hiring a senior engineer to file paperwork.

Agent Role Fallback Chain Notes
Explore Fast codebase grep Grok Code Fast → opencode-go/minimax-m2.7 → opencode/minimax-m2.5 → Haiku → GPT-5-Nano Speed is everything. Fire 10 in parallel. Uses opencode-go/minimax-m2.7 where the provider catalog exposes it, falling back to opencode/minimax-m2.5.
Librarian Docs/code search opencode-go/minimax-m2.7 → opencode/minimax-m2.5 → Haiku → GPT-5-Nano Doc retrieval doesn't need deep reasoning. Uses opencode-go/minimax-m2.7 where the provider catalog exposes it, falling back to opencode/minimax-m2.5.
Multimodal Looker Vision/screenshots GPT-5.4 → opencode-go/kimi-k2.5 → GLM-4.6v → GPT-5-Nano Uses the first available multimodal-capable fallback.
Sisyphus-Junior Category executor Claude Sonnet → opencode-go/kimi-k2.5 → GPT-5.4 → MiniMax M2.7 → Big Pickle Handles delegated category tasks. Sonnet-tier default.

Model Families

Claude Family

Communicative, instruction-following, structured output. Best for agents that need to follow complex multi-step prompts.

Model Strengths
Claude Opus 4.6 Best overall. Highest compliance with complex prompts. Default for Sisyphus.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Faster, cheaper. Good balance for everyday tasks.
Claude Haiku 4.5 Fast and cheap. Good for quick tasks and utility work.
Kimi K2.5 Behaves very similarly to Claude. Great all-rounder at lower cost.
GLM 5 Claude-like behavior. Solid for orchestration tasks.

GPT Family

Principle-driven, explicit reasoning, deep technical capability. Best for agents that work autonomously on complex problems.

Model Strengths
GPT-5.3 Codex Deep coding powerhouse. Autonomous exploration. Still available for deep category and explicit overrides.
GPT-5.4 High intelligence, strategic reasoning. Default for Oracle, Momus, and a key fallback for Prometheus / Atlas. Uses xhigh variant for Momus.
GPT-5.4 Mini Fast + strong reasoning. Good for lightweight autonomous tasks. Default for quick category.
GPT-5-Nano Ultra-cheap, fast. Good for simple utility tasks.

Other Models

Model Strengths
Gemini 3.1 Pro Excels at visual/frontend tasks. Different reasoning style. Default for visual-engineering and artistry.
Gemini 3 Flash Fast. Good for doc search and light tasks.
Grok Code Fast 1 Blazing fast code grep. Default for Explore agent.
MiniMax M2.7 Fast and smart. Used where provider catalogs expose the newer MiniMax line, especially through OpenCode Go.
MiniMax M2.5 Legacy OpenCode catalog entry still used in some fallback chains for compatibility.

OpenCode Go

A premium subscription tier ($10/month) that provides reliable access to Chinese frontier models through OpenCode's infrastructure.

Available Models:

Model Use Case
opencode-go/kimi-k2.5 Vision-capable, Claude-like reasoning. Used by Sisyphus, Atlas, Sisyphus-Junior, Multimodal Looker.
opencode-go/glm-5 Text-only orchestration model. Used by Oracle, Prometheus, Metis, Momus.
opencode-go/minimax-m2.7 Ultra-cheap, fast responses. Used by Librarian, Explore, Atlas, and Sisyphus-Junior for utility work.

When It Gets Used:

OpenCode Go models appear in fallback chains as intermediate options. They bridge the gap between premium Claude access and free-tier alternatives. The system tries OpenCode Go models before falling back to cheaper provider-specific entries like MiniMax or Big Pickle, then GPT alternatives where applicable.

Go-Only Scenarios:

Some model identifiers like k2p5 (paid Kimi K2.5) and glm-5 may only be available through OpenCode Go subscription in certain regions. When configured with these short identifiers, the system resolves them through the opencode-go provider first.

About Free-Tier Fallbacks

You may see model names like kimi-k2.5-free, minimax-m2.7, minimax-m2.5, or big-pickle (GLM 4.6) in the source code or logs. These are provider-specific or speed-optimized entries in fallback chains. The exact MiniMax model can differ by provider catalog.

You don't need to configure them. The system includes them so it degrades gracefully when you don't have every paid subscription. If you have the paid version, the paid version is always preferred.


Task Categories

When agents delegate work, they don't pick a model name — they pick a category. The category maps to the right model automatically.

Category When Used Fallback Chain
visual-engineering Frontend, UI, CSS, design Gemini 3.1 Pro → GLM 5 → Claude Opus → opencode-go/glm-5 → K2P5
ultrabrain Maximum reasoning needed GPT-5.4 → Gemini 3.1 Pro → Claude Opus → opencode-go/glm-5
deep Deep coding, complex logic GPT-5.3 Codex → Claude Opus → Gemini 3.1 Pro
artistry Creative, novel approaches Gemini 3.1 Pro → Claude Opus → GPT-5.4
quick Simple, fast tasks GPT-5.4 Mini → Claude Haiku → Gemini Flash → opencode-go/minimax-m2.7 → GPT-5-Nano
unspecified-high General complex work Claude Opus → GPT-5.4 → GLM 5 → K2P5 → opencode-go/glm-5 → Kimi K2.5
unspecified-low General standard work Claude Sonnet → GPT-5.3 Codex → opencode-go/kimi-k2.5 → Gemini Flash
writing Text, docs, prose Gemini Flash → opencode-go/kimi-k2.5 → Claude Sonnet

See the Orchestration System Guide for how agents dispatch tasks to categories.


Customization

Example Configuration

{
  "$schema": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent/dev/assets/oh-my-opencode.schema.json",

  "agents": {
    // Main orchestrator: Claude Opus or Kimi K2.5 work best
    "sisyphus": {
      "model": "kimi-for-coding/k2p5",
      "ultrawork": { "model": "anthropic/claude-opus-4-6", "variant": "max" },
    },

    // Research agents: cheaper models are fine
    "librarian": { "model": "google/gemini-3-flash" },
    "explore": { "model": "github-copilot/grok-code-fast-1" },

    // Architecture consultation: GPT or Claude Opus
    "oracle": { "model": "openai/gpt-5.4", "variant": "high" },

    // Prometheus inherits sisyphus model; just add prompt guidance
    "prometheus": {
      "prompt_append": "Leverage deep & quick agents heavily, always in parallel.",
    },
  },

  "categories": {
    "quick": { "model": "opencode/gpt-5-nano" },
    "unspecified-low": { "model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6" },
    "unspecified-high": { "model": "anthropic/claude-opus-4-6", "variant": "max" },
    "visual-engineering": {
      "model": "google/gemini-3.1-pro",
      "variant": "high",
    },
    "writing": { "model": "google/gemini-3-flash" },
  },

  // Limit expensive providers; let cheap ones run freely
  "background_task": {
    "providerConcurrency": {
      "anthropic": 3,
      "openai": 3,
      "opencode": 10,
      "zai-coding-plan": 10,
    },
    "modelConcurrency": {
      "anthropic/claude-opus-4-6": 2,
      "opencode/gpt-5-nano": 20,
    },
  },
}

Run opencode models to see available models, opencode auth login to authenticate providers.

Safe vs Dangerous Overrides

Safe — same personality type:

  • Sisyphus: Opus → Sonnet, Kimi K2.5, GLM 5 (all communicative models)
  • Prometheus: Opus → GPT-5.4 (auto-switches to the GPT prompt)
  • Atlas: Claude Sonnet 4.6 → GPT-5.4 (auto-switches to the GPT prompt)

Dangerous — personality mismatch:

  • Sisyphus → older GPT models: Still a bad fit. GPT-5.4 is the only dedicated GPT prompt path.
  • Hephaestus → Claude: Built for Codex's autonomous style. Claude can't replicate this.
  • Explore → Opus: Massive cost waste. Explore needs speed, not intelligence.
  • Librarian → Opus: Same. Doc search doesn't need Opus-level reasoning.

How Model Resolution Works

Each agent has a fallback chain. The system tries models in priority order until it finds one available through your connected providers. You don't need to configure providers per model. Just authenticate (opencode auth login) and the system figures out which models are available and where.

Core-agent tab cycling is deterministic via injected runtime order field. The fixed priority order is Sisyphus (order: 1), Hephaestus (order: 2), Prometheus (order: 3), and Atlas (order: 4), then the remaining agents follow.

Your explicit configuration always wins. If you set a specific model for an agent, that choice takes precedence even when resolution data is cold.

Variant and reasoningEffort overrides are normalized to model-supported values, so cross-provider overrides degrade gracefully instead of failing hard.

Model capabilities are models.dev-backed, with a refreshable cache and capability diagnostics. Use bunx oh-my-opencode refresh-model-capabilities to update the cache, or configure model_capabilities.auto_refresh_on_start to refresh at startup.

To see which models your agents will actually use, run bunx oh-my-opencode doctor. This shows effective model resolution based on your current authentication and config.

Agent Request → User Override (if configured) → Fallback Chain → System Default

File-Based Prompts

You can load agent system prompts from external files using file:// URLs in the prompt field, or append additional content with prompt_append. The prompt_append field also works on categories.

{
  "agents": {
    "sisyphus": {
      "prompt": "file:///path/to/custom-prompt.md"
    },
    "oracle": {
      "prompt_append": "file:///path/to/additional-context.md"
    }
  },
  "categories": {
    "deep": {
      "prompt_append": "file:///path/to/deep-category-append.md"
    }
  }
}

The file content is loaded at runtime and injected into the agent's system prompt. Supports ~ expansion for home directory and relative file:// paths.


See Also